And Amendment 3 moves decision making about our community to Tallahassee.
Jacksonville City Auditors estimate a $300 million annual recurring loss taken out of the roughly $2 billion the city spends each year on the Sheriff’s Office, Fire-Rescue, parks, libraries, public works and neighborhood services.1
The Sheriff’s Office and Fire-Rescue. More than half of what the city spends, and equal to 83% of all property tax revenue.
Public works, parks, libraries, neighborhoods, planning and economic development, plus health, housing, homelessness and youth programs.
Debt service, unfunded pension obligations, and interlocal agreements with Baldwin and the Beaches. Fixed by contract.
Jacksonville already invests about half as much per resident as its peer cities.2 A cut this large is not the kind of thing a city absorbs by trimming waste. It is a cut that takes away the services residents rely on.
Four changes to how property is taxed in Florida:
See note 3.
Yes. Amendment 3 does not limit your local government’s ability to increase taxes or fees for things like parks, libraries, wastewater, and impact fees to make up for lost property tax revenue.
It is likely. According to the Tax Foundation, eliminating such a significant share of Florida’s property tax base would not lower the cost of running local services. It would simply require that the lost revenue be raised somewhere else, including through higher property tax rates on everything that stays taxable. The Florida Policy Institute has made a similar point about rental and commercial property: if those owners pay more, they would have to decide whether to absorb the cost or shift it onto renters and consumers.
See note 5.
Nothing in Amendment 3 provides for it. The enrolled joint resolution contains no reimbursement, backfill, trust fund or offset for local revenue losses, for any county, and the implementing bill appropriates nothing.
A future Legislature could choose to appropriate something. Nothing obligates it to, and the proposals floated so far are aimed at rural counties rather than urban ones.
See note 4.
Jacksonville already invests about half as much per resident as its peer cities.2 A reduction of this size is not the scale of thing that gets absorbed by trimming inefficiency. It is the scale of thing that removes services.
Closing a gap this size is a series of choices. The budget tool lets you try making them.
Jax Tax Facts is for Public education purposes only, it is not legal, tax or financial advice.